Doctor's Announcing New Practice

LIBYA AND 'CHINA-VI

Today on Libertia :

do not know if it surprised me more the news that the Italians in Libya, before the evacuation, had just 1,500, or rather what the Chinese were almost 36mila. I'd say I hit the set of two. The Chronicles of these years we had been accustomed to think that a reckless and partenrship old Italian-Libyan had now assumed elephantine size. Microbial dimensions are, at least in numerical terms, in the presence of the with China, which until a few days ago but had never read or heard a word. We suddenly discovered that the Chinese was the largest non-African communities in this Mediterranean country we thought we knew so well. China joined in Libya in silence and out of sight of our media. But it came in mass, all right. In 2000 the business relationship between the two countries generated an exchange volume of 10 billion dollars in 2010 to 90 million, almost ten-fold. Last Saturday, Marco Valerio Priest has this amazing presence X-rayed on the website of Il Foglio , launching this idea: "Most of the Chinese evacuees, in contrast to what happened to all other foreign workers, has not yet been repatriated but only deployed in neighboring African countries, from Sudan. Perhaps to wait Gaddafi "redistribute" the wells of oil? "

The question is even more pervasive when one considers that in these years what Reagan called the" mad dog "(angry, not" crazy "as usually translated feeling: the gradient has a weight because it always goes down a rabid dog) had unusual relationships woven "friendship" with other Western countries (our front line, as is known) and even with Russia, but not with China - a country that has not visited since 1982, and which does not receive the visit of a head of state for nine years. Just imagine what will happen now that the "friends" referred to above are irreparably compromised and everything is called into question.
not forget that the Libyan oil, unlike the gas travels along flexible routes, which can be directed at any particular buyer. The buyer of China, it seems, has already seen open the tap.

As it happens right in these days the second anniversary of service to the bloodthirsty dictator Omar Al Bashir of Sudan arrest warrant issued against him by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

When he received the notification, Bashir was intended to inaugurate a monstrous, gigantic dam on the Nile with attached titanic power station: building designed, built and funded by the Chinese. The same Chinese now officially asked to stay the arrest warrant, and who for years posed the veto in the UN Security Council sanctions against the genocide in Darfur.

For the rest of the world the issue of Darfur had made impracticable any commercial partnership with the Sudan and China had the opportunity to implement some sort of strike-breaking antiumanitario, selling under the weapons used to slaughter civilians : the rest has an interest in food as long as possible the continuation of the hell in which to tap Western competitors stay away from all that gold black.

Two years later, Bashir is still there: it was "democratically" elected a year ago with many congratulations by the Beijing regime.

Currently, China is to chair the UN Security Council, and has already said that veto the establishment of a no-fly zone on Libya.
We face a choice: work for a military intervention such as that the U.S. and other NATO countries, albeit hesitant and stuttering, are preparing to set up or, as suggested by our Minister of the Interior (and not just apparently) us calm down and stalling by € diplomatic, pending event otherwise favorable to the resumption of supplies and contracts.

"perfectly free to stand at the window while the militias gheddafiane even opened fire against ambulances ," writes the director of the time, rightly Mario Sechi, " but then we must have the courage to look in the mirror in the morning, find the words to explain that in Lebanon, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan are the outpost of the West and Libya - literally created by the Italians - we do not care a fig if it stays dry and we are also pleased with Gaddafi at the bottom. "

True, but even if it be entirely cynical, hyper-realistic, remains the other argument, the one mentioned by Angelo Panebianco looking like " a vengeful dictator back in the saddle could decide to wipe us out to the advantage of less scrupulous competitors. China, above all, a country that has no problems dealing with the worst dictators, it would certainly be glad to take over our and other Western companies. " That's right.